Judges Summary for Preliminary Design Presentation Due
- Due Oct 21, 2021 by 11am
- Points 100
- Submitting a file upload
- File Types pdf
- Available Sep 6, 2021 at 7:45am - Oct 28, 2021 at 2:45pm
12.06.2020
Please upload a pdf version of your judges' summary to Canvas. Please consult with your mentors to see if they want their own personal copy. The judges will already have received and read your summaries at the time of the presentation, but it would be recommended to bring additional copies.
Examples of past Judges' Summaries found here. ACE.pdf Links to an external site., EDrive.pdf Links to an external site..
Rubric
Find Rubric
Please include a title
Keep in mind that 46 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
|
1. Identified the desired needs of the system, component, or process?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
2. Identified realistic constraints in each of the following categories? Economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability.
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
3. Developed at least three technically feasible alternative solutions?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
4. Compared the alternative solutions, using appropriate metrics?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
5. Recommended one of the solutions, by providing compelling, logical, credible, and audience-appropriate justifications for recommending a solution to a problem from a group of alternative solutions?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
6. Created a realistic schedule of design and construction with critical path items appropriate to the project?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
7. Created a realistic opinion of probable cost appropriate to the project?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
8. Effectively organized a written document? In assessing performance, please consider whether the document: Was effectively organized at the macro-level (section-level) in an audience appropriate manner. Was effectively organized at the micro-level (paragraph-level) in an audience appropriate manner.
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
9. Effectively delivered a written document?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
10. In assessing performance, please consider whether the document: Used suitable graphics and integrated them usefully to clarify technical concepts. Effectively summarized and emphasized key conclusions and recommendations. Employed clear, concise, unambiguous, and cohesive writing (with emphasis on correct mechanics and fluid style). Was free of spelling errors. Had no more than four pages of text and no more than two pages of figures, tables, etc.
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|