Preliminary Design Presentations
- Due Oct 27, 2021 by 11pm
- Points 230
- Submitting a file upload
- File Types pdf and wmv
- Available Sep 6, 2021 at 12am - Nov 3, 2021 at 7:45am
12.10.20
Upload a pdf or wmv version of your preliminary design presentation (wmv is preferred if you included an animation in your presentation). All components of the presentation must be in a single file.
The Preliminary Design Presentation will be made in the evening in the rooms and times shown in the "Modules" section. This schedule will be posted on Tuesday, September 28th.
Example PER Presentations can be found here. Example PER Presentation Slides Team 1 Taliesen Hillside Drafting Room Stabilization Links to an external site.. Example PER Presentation Slides Team 12 Madison Metro Bus Barn Links to an external site..
Rubric
Find Rubric
Please include a title
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
|
1. Identified the desired needs of the system, component, or process?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
2. Identified realistic constraints?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
3. Developed at least three technically feasible alternative solutions?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
4. Compared the alternative solutions, using appropriate metrics?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
5. Recommended one of the solutions, by providing compelling, logical, credible, and audience-appropriate justifications for recommending a solution to a problem from a group of alternative solutions?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
6. The scope of the problem was sufficiently broad that no single team member could solve the problem alone?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
7. Broke down a system into its component parts, such that its performance could be understood?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
8. Analyzed well-defined engineering problems in at least four technical areas1 appropriate to civil engineering?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
9. Solved well-defined engineering problems in at least four technical areas1 appropriate to civil engineering?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
10. Understood the economic sustainability of their engineering design?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
11. Understood the environmental sustainability of their engineering design?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
12. Understood the social sustainability (including cultural, psychological and political impacts) of their engineering design?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
13. Understood how the above impacts were important at the neighborhood, city, state, national, and global levels?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
14. Used modern computer software as a tool to solve an engineering problem?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
15. Used modern codes and standards as a tool to solve an engineering problem?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
16. Recognized uncertainties in data and knowledge and listed those relevant to the engineering design?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
17. Distinguished between uncertainties that are data-based and those that are knowledge-based?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
18. Explained the significance of uncertainties on the performance and safety of an engineering system?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
19. Created a Project schedule with critical path items appropriate to the project?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
20. Created a realistic opinion of probable cost appropriate to the project?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
21. Effectively organized an oral presentation with logical flow? In assessing performance, please consider whether the presentation: Included an introduction of team members who defined their responsibilities for both the project and the presentation. Discussed adjustments in scope and/or budget (as compared to the original RFP) that were agreed to by the client/mentors/instructors? Identified the desired needs of the project and stated the recommended solution from prelim design. Made wise use of time for each item to be discussed.
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
22. Effectively delivered the content of an oral presentation? In assessing performance, please consider whether the presentation: Provided clear, emphatic, efficient oral delivery of technical information. Identified and created suitable graphics and equations and integrated them usefully to clarify technical concepts. Contained effectively designed slides for technical presentations with readable text. Showed ability of individuals to work well as a team. Professionally responded to judges’ questions and professionally interacted with judges.
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
23. Understood the importance of professional attire?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|