Interview
- Due Sep 23, 2021 by 9:15am
- Points 140
- Submitting a file upload
- File Types pdf
- Available Sep 6, 2021 at 12am - Sep 30, 2021 at 7:45am
12.06.2020
Upload a pdf or wmv version of your interview presentation (wmv is preferred if you used animation). All components of the presentation must be in a single file. Tips and advice on the use of PowerPoint on this and subsequent assignments can be found in this PowerPoint WhitePaper.
The Interview Presentation will be made during class time. Each team will present their interview and judge one interview per the schedule shown under "Schedules'' in the Modules section.
Two examples of past presentation slides are shown here Example Interview Slides Team 6 Stockholm Watershed Evaluation.pdf, Example Interview SlidesTeam 2 HWY 12 Sauk City Bridge.pdf.
Rubric
Find Rubric
Please include a title
Keep in mind that 46 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
|
1. Introduced and summarized the desired needs of the system, component, or process?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
2. Presented a statement of interest?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
3. Summarized a set of constraints for the system, component, or process?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
4. Summarized preliminary concepts of alternatives that could be evaluated to solve the problem?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
5. Summarized a scope of services for the design work?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
6. Summarized project elements involving at least four technical areas of civil engineering? Summarized project elements involving at least four technical areas of civil engineering? Note: For undergraduate education purposes, ASCE considers seven technical areas of civil engineering: (1) structural, (2) geotechnical, (3) environmental, (4) transportation, (5) hydraulics/hydrology, (6) construction, and (7) surveying/geospatial measurements.
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
7. Understood the organization of the team with an organization chart?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
8. Showed that each student would serve in a well-defined role, bringing a particular expertise to bear in solving the problem?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
9. Summarized team qualifications?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
10. Summarized a project schedule, with emphasis on design schedule rather than construction schedule?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
11. Summarized how the team would monitor schedule and budget?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
12. Was effectively organized with logical flow? In assessing performance, please consider whether the presentation: Was effectively organized at the macro-level in an audience appropriate manner. Was effectively organized at the micro-level in an audience appropriate manner. Made wise use of time for each item to be discussed.
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
13. Was effectively delivered? In assessing performance, please consider whether the presentation: Provided clear, emphatic, efficient oral delivery of technical information. Identified and created suitable graphics and equations and integrated them usefully to clarify technical concepts. Contained effectively designed slides for technical presentations with readable text.
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
14. Showed an understanding of the importance of professional attire?
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|