This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAudience & Revisions_2352
Author successfully revises final draft in a way that clearly distinguishes it from the rough draft. Final draft is not simply a verbatim copy with only minor edits, but a substantively different draft.
Author includes a revision paragraph summarizing revisions made to the rough draft.
Final draft differs substantially from the rough draft. Highlighted sentences taken verbatim from the rough draft represent only a minor portion of the final copy. Revision paragraph summarizes revisions the the author *actually* made to the essay.
Few revisions appear to have been done aside from only minor grammatical changes. Tone and audience are somewhat appropriate, but too informal for college writing.
Audience is inappropriate, revisions are incomplete or not done. Final draft is indistinguishable from rough draft. Only extremely minor improvements in grammar were made.
Thesis statement successfully makes a *claim*, rather than simply summarizing the material. Thesis statement is clear and concise, and the reader has a good understanding of the author's claim.
All quotations successfully support the main idea/topic sentence and are cited appropriately. Author successfully incorporates usage of citations in order to explain his or her thesis.
All quotations successfully support main points/main idea. Quotations are successfully incorporated into writing, a little more explanation might be helpful
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStructure_8282
Author organizes 3-4 main points, which become the body of the essay. Each paragraph is one idea (like elements grouped together). New ideas = new paragraphs.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic Sentences_6243
Author crafts effective topic sentences which introduce main ideas and advance the paper's organization. If only topic sentences are read aloud, a rough outline emerges.
Conclusion successfully answers the "so what?" and "why should I care?" questions. Author relates the topic sentences/main points to the thesis and ties these concepts together well.
Conclusion successfully answers "so what?" and "why should I care?" questions, but additional clarification or description might be necessary. Author returns to points mentioned in the introduction
Conclusion somewhat answers "so what?" and "why should I care?" questions but does not return to points mentioned in the introduction and is confusing.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTransitions_3703
Paragraphs flow smoothly, linked together by transitions that repeat key words. Transitional words used effectively (e.g.: yet, however, for example, consequently). Keep in mind transitions between sentences as well as between paragraphs.
Writing generally flows smoothly and transitions are used, although occasionally better words of phrases can be found. Does not significantly detract from writing.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAttribution Plagiarism_6217
Author attributes all information and quotes from sources. Effectively uses quotations (either partial or full) in APA format. Author uses own words and new language to paraphrase original source's ideas, thus avoiding plagiarism.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVoice_2921
Author reveals a good ear for interesting quotes from sources. Author uses active voice that enlivens action, shows agency of subject and shortens sentences. Author avoids excessive use of passive voice (forms of "to be" or "by") that obscures action or agency. (e.g.: "Mistakes were made"--by whom, zombies?)
Essay is free of grammar errors, needless words and windy phrases. Word usage is appropriate for the type of writing assigned. Essay has clearly been proofread for grammar.
Essay is mostly free of spelling/grammar errors, needless words, windy or redundant phrases. Only a handful of errors. Author attends to comma usage and word choice appropriately.
Essay contains several grammar issues, windy phrases or needless words. Word usage is generally appropriate, but could have benefitted from proofreading.
There are several grammar issues present in this paper that detract from the credibility/preparation of the paper. Essay could have benefitted from proofreading.
There are many grammar issues present in this essay. Several windy phrases or needless sentences, word use is not generally appropriate and this essay could have benefitted from proofreading.
Word usage in this essay makes it difficult to follow writer's logic. Grammar errors seriously detract from the reader's understanding of the author's main points. Essay clearly has not been proofread.
_1613
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
Find Rubric
