Rubric

Keep in mind that 45 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
A07 - Judges Summary Rubric
A07 - Judges Summary Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
1. Identified the desired needs of the system, component, or process?
threshold: pts
10 pts Exceeded Expectations
9 pts Met Expectation
8 pts Met Expectation
7 pts Met Expectation
6 pts Did not meet expectations
4 pts No evidence of work
pts
10 pts
--
2. Identified realistic constraints in each of the following categories? Economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability.
threshold: pts
10 pts Exceeded Expectations
9 pts Met Expectation
8 pts Met Expectation
7 pts Met Expectation
6 pts Did not meet expectations
4 pts No evidence of work
pts
10 pts
--
3. Briefly reviewed previously presented alternatives and discussed why presented alternative was selected.
threshold: pts
10 pts Exceeded Expectations
9 pts Met Expectation
8 pts Met Expectation
7 pts Met Expectation
6 pts Did not meet expectations
4 pts No evidence of work
pts
10 pts
--
4. Clearly described and visually presented selected alternative.
threshold: pts
10 pts Exceeded Expectations
9 pts Met Expectation
8 pts Met Expectation
7 pts Met Expectation
6 pts Did not meet expectations
4 pts No evidence of work
pts
10 pts
--
5. Created a realistic schedule of design and construction with critical path items appropriate to the project?
threshold: pts
10 pts Exceeded Expectations
9 pts Met Expectation
8 pts Met Expectation
7 pts Met Expectation
6 pts Did not meet expectations
4 pts No evidence of work
pts
10 pts
--
6. Created a realistic opinion of probable cost appropriate to the project?
threshold: pts
10 pts Exceeded Expectations
9 pts Met Expectation
8 pts Met Expectation
7 pts Met Expectation
6 pts Did not meet expectations
4 pts No evidence of work
pts
10 pts
--
7. Effectively organized a written document? In assessing performance, please consider whether the document: Was effectively organized at the macro-level (section-level) in an audience appropriate manner. Was effectively organized at the micro-level (paragraph-level) in an audience appropriate manner.
threshold: pts
10 pts Exceeded Expectations
9 pts Met Expectation
8 pts Met Expectation
7 pts Met Expectation
6 pts Did not meet expectations
4 pts No evidence of work
pts
10 pts
--
8. In assessing performance, please consider whether the document: Used suitable graphics and integrated them usefully to clarify technical concepts. Effectively summarized and emphasized key conclusions and recommendations. Employed clear, concise, unambiguous, and cohesive writing (with emphasis on correct mechanics and fluid style). Was free of spelling errors. Had no more than two pages of text and no more than two pages of figures, tables, etc.
threshold: pts
10 pts Exceeded Expectations
9 pts Met Expectation
8 pts Met Expectation
7 pts Met Expectation
6 pts Did not meet expectations
4 pts No evidence of work
pts
10 pts
--