Project Management Report 2 (with Timesheets) and Reflection 2 Due
- Due Oct 12, 2021 by 7:45am
- Points 25
- Submitting a file upload
- Available Sep 6, 2021 at 12am - Oct 19, 2021 at 7:45am
12.04.2020
Submit a single pdf file.
CBL Reflection 2: CBL prompt 2 for Fall 2021.pdf Download CBL prompt 2 for Fall 2021.pdf
Guidance, templates, submittal requirements for this PMR are similar to (with the below changes) and can be found under the Project Management Report 1 Assignment.
In PMR Report 1 the teams described organizational and participation issues that must be resolved early in the semester (now). Please focus this (and the remainder) of the PMRs on the following issues:
1. Status of team organization and participation.
2. Budget allocated to date.
3. Budget spent to date.
4. Work completed to date.
5. Project % complete and budget % used.
6. Tasks coming up next.
7. Any problems encountered and specifically how they will be resolved.
8. Anything else of concern regarding the project, staff, budget, or schedule .
Rubric
Find Rubric
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
|
1. Give them three points if they mentioned what leadership model is being followed by the team and what leadership roles that team members are taking.
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
2. Give them three points if they described difficulties encountered in implementing their project management plan to-date and how those will be resolved before the next project management report
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
3. Give them three points if they identify the hours budgeted to-date per staff member in the last PMR.
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
4. Give them three points if they report the total number of hours expended to date by staff member.
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
5. Give them three points if they adequately addressed the question: “Is the team on track to staying under the project budget compared to the amount of work completed?" And, if not, what will be done to get back on-budget and schedule?” Give them 1 point if the answer seems inadequate. Give them 0 points if they didn’t answer the question.
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
6. Did each team member make a significant contribution since the last PMR? They get three points if the were within 20% of the number of hours described for each team member in the last PMR. . They’d get two points if they were within 40% of the budget for that individual. Note – teams will often try to claim that certain individuals didn’t have the expertise for a significant workload in this part of the project. At this point in their careers, students should have a desire to learn something outside their area of expertise and a desire to help others carry the load. As long as they are assisting or supervised by others who have the expertise to solve a particular problem, they are not violating ethical code by doing work they are not qualified to do. In addition, continuous input from all team members is critical to maintain communication during the project
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
7. Give them 2 points if they adequately addressed the question: “Does the team consider the workload distribution to be fair and equitable?” Give them 1 point if the answer seems inadequate. Give them 0 points if they didn’t answer the question.
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
8. Give them 2 points if all timesheets show the correct dates. Give them 1 point if 1 or more timesheets are showing incorrect dates. Give them no points if none of the timesheets have the correct dates.
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
9. Give them 1 point if the totals column and the totals row are completed and are accurate on all timesheets.
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
10. Give them 1 point if the chargeable hours row and the chargeable ratio are completed and are accurate on all timesheets.
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|
|
|
11. Included responses to the community based learning prompt from all team members
threshold:
pts
|
pts
--
|